Join the Conversation ~
Decoding Dyslexia Maryland
  • Home
  • Policy
    • State Issues >
      • Legislation
      • Advocate's Guide
      • Kirwan Commission
      • Dyslexia Technical Assistance
      • MD Dyslexia Task Force
    • Federal
  • Events
    • Community Partners
    • Literacy for All Materials
    • Photos
  • Resources
    • Dyslexia >
      • Dyslexia Stories >
        • You Tube Channel
        • Tell Your Story
    • Fact Sheets
    • Reading & Literacy
    • Implementation >
      • Research
  • Blog
    • The Reading Teacher Blog
  • Join
    • Newsletter
  • About
    • You Tube Channel
    • Our Footprint
    • Press Releases
  • Contact
    • Local Chapters
    • DD-US
  • Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
  • MD Blueprint
  • Ready to Read

Bring Dyslexia into the Sunshine: Invisible No More

4/17/2015

7 Comments

 
Sen. Bill Cassidy​ introduced dyslexia amendments on April 15th during Committee markup of #ESEA. The original amendment sought to allow title II $ in ESEA to be used to provide professional development about #dyslexia to teachers.  

Teachers do not receive college prep to identify or address dyslexia in public schools.  By the time public schools recognize reading failure the student is usually in 3rd grade and is too far behind to easily catch up.   Many struggling readers can be identified early through Response to Intervention dyslexia screeners and provided effective instruction that meets the Knowledge & Practice Standards for Teachers of Reading.  

Unfortunately, many public schools can't identify dyslexia and reading disabilities and don't provide effective, structured literacy programs. Students who struggle to read often pay for tutoring, leave the public system or graduate with inferior literacy skills.

THE CASSIDY AMENDMENTS

Senator Cassidy (R-LA) attempted to address the injustice of students with dyslexia who are never identified in public schools and, even when identified, are not provided appropriate interventions.  The amendment allowed Title II money to be used for teacher education on identification and interventions for dyslexia so that children would not fail to read.

OPPONENTS & PROPONENTS

54 organizations supported the Cassidy amendment, including IDA, Eye to Eye, Decoding Dyslexia, Dyslexic Advantage and 3,000 people signed the NCLD online petition and over 5,000 people signed the Dyslexic Advantage petition. 

Sen Patty Murray (WA), the co-chair of the HELP committee had a list of 49 organizations that opposed the Cassidy amendment. Among them were NEA, PTA, Easter Seals, COPAA. 

Opponents did not want to "single out" one disability over another for funding in Title II of ESEA.  

Proponents pointed out that all persons with disabilities can struggle with reading failure and dyslexia.  Persons with dyslexia can also have ADHD, Autism, Dysgraphia and  other disabilities.  Proponents also pointed out that reading failure is not limited to persons identified under IDEA as a person with a disability of dyslexia.  Many people are NOT identified with a disability but still struggle to read OR they are protected under Section 504 and receive accommodations, but not interventions to teach them to read.

  They also pointed out that dyslexia is the most prevalent of all learning disabilties and has a huge impact on our society.  Literacy issues, as noted by the Department of Education in this study, are pervasive.  

SEE Making Skills Everyone's Business

According to the US Department of Education, one in six adults (54 Million) has low literacy skills.  One in three has low numeracy skills and low skills are just as prevalent now as they were 20 years ago.
Source: Making Skills Everyone's Business, p. 3, USDOE, Office of Career, Technical and Adult Education, February 2015.
People with learning disabilities are twice as likely to have low literacy skills.  The MAJORITY of those with low skills (more than 60%) have completed high school.

Incidence of Dyslexia in US Student Population 

  • Approximately 49.8 million students are enrolled in the United States public education system. 
  • Of those, approximately 6.5 million (13%) receive services under the IDEA law. 
  • Of those receiving services under the IDEA law, approximately 2.3 million (36%) of them have reading goals on their IEPs and are likely dyslexic. 
  • Approximately 1.95 million students are highly likely to have dyslexia.
  • If dyslexia as an occurrence rate of approximately 15%, then approximately 6.49 million regular education students are likely to be dyslexic and not be eligible under the IDEA law. 
  • This number reflects over three times the total number of all students with any sort of eligibility category served under the IDEA law. 
  • Taken together, adding the 1.95 million students served under the IDEA law with those who are not, 6.49 million, we have an approximate total of 8.44 million students in America who are likely dyslexic. 

 Data sources:
http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372
https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgg.asp

 Notes Regarding Calculations: while the above calculations are approximate even if they are off by 10%, it is still an egregious injustice. 

7 Comments
    Tweets by @dyslexiasomd

    Author

    Decoding Dyslexia Maryland 

    Archives

    July 2020
    May 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    March 2019
    October 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    April 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    July 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    June 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014

    Categories

    All
    DD MD
    DD-MD
    #DDSM14
    Decoding Dyslexia
    Dyslexia
    Meetings
    #showme1in5

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly